IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen.
Gaby Ashkenazi Addresses NATO Chiefs of Defense Conference in Brussels
Today, November 20th,
2008, IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Gaby Ashkenazi addressed the
NATO Chiefs of Defense Conference in Brussels.
In his speech,
Lt.-Gen. Ashkenazi discussed the new challenges to global security in the 21st
century, singling out global terrorism as the primary threat. He said that,
"At this time, our main objective is to defeat global terrorism and bring
stability and tranquility to the world's population…This is definitely a
complex mission since…the terrorists have financial support, resources and
equipment from terror collaborators…[they are] supported by radical states
that sponsor terrorism." He also discussed the terrorists' military
aspirations and their desires for nuclear weapons capabilities: "Our enemies,
the terrorists have become more and more sophisticated and are keen to use all
measures at their disposal to fulfill their despicable goals. They are
characterized by threats which know no borders, which target the home front
and lack any moral restraints. The enemy is no longer in uniform. He has
become elusive, harder to detect….The battleground has widened to engulf the
field of ideas. Therefore the terrorists are determined never to surrender,
and are ready to kill and be killed."
In light of the
global terrorism problem, Lt.-Gen. Ashkenazi also addressed the need for,
"close cooperation between the moderate forces in the international
community." He explicitly stated that, "The State of Israel is interested in
deepening its security-related relationship with the [NATO] alliance as a
whole, and with the individual members, through partnership programs in as
many areas as possible. To advance their goals, terrorists seek to achieve
advanced military capabilities, and the most bothering of these are nuclear
abilities. Therefore, there must be close cooperation between the moderate
forces in the international community. The professional militaries fighting
terrorism must aspire to maximize interoperability, and to share lessons
learned in the various arenas."
Lt.-Gen. Ashkenazi
mentioned the financial support, resources and equipment that terrorists
receive from terror collaborators — radical states that sponsor terrorism.
"Needless to say that for those violent countries there are no morals, no
human rights and no respect for international law and for innocent lives."
He pointed out
that Israel is in a difficult, but unique position, located, as it is, at the
center of the global struggle with terrorism. "…Due to [Israel's] unique
position, special experience and proven abilities, Israel is an indispensable
ally to the moderate forces in this global struggle… [especially because]
Israel has become a leader in areas of technology and of fighting terrorism."
He concluded by reiterating Israel's commitment to international
cooperation, noting that, "The IDF is ready to accept and examine any
suggestions from NATO regarding new channels of cooperation, especially in
fighting terrorism in an asymmetric warfare."
During his visit
to Brussels, Lt. Gen. Ashkenazi met with his American colleague, Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen, as well as his counterparts
from other countries, including Great Britain, Germany, the Netherlands,
Turkey, Spain, France and Poland. He also met with senior NATO and EU
officials.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Address by the President of the
State of Israel
on the occasion of his visit to
the U.K.
19.11.08
àîáøâå
ìôéøñåí òã ìðùéàú äðàåí áñáéáåú äùòä 18:30 (ùòåï éùøàì)
(Embargo for publication until
the speech will be delivered at 18:30 (Local)
Mr. Speaker
Lord Speaker
Distinguished lords, members of
Parliament, Ladies and Gentlemen,
While addressing the Israeli
Knesset, Prime Minister Gordon Brown shared with us a story of his father.
The Knesset was deeply moved by
the great believer who used to hold an annual pilgrimage to Israel and upon
his return shared with his family, feelings regarding the state of the Holy
Land and the spirit of Jerusalem.
And then the Prime Minister added:
"I will never forget those early
images of your home in my home, and the stories my father would tell. Stories
of the struggles, sacrifices, tribulations and triumphs of the Israeli people
in their new state. Your home is mine too."
His remarks invoked a distant
memory within me. Today, in your parliament, I feel like your home is my home
as well.
Gordon Brown's father cherished
the Bible, my father experienced an attempt to kill the people of the Bible.
In pre-state Israel, my father
volunteered for the Royal British Army. He was captured by the German forces
and became a prisoner of war.
First he hid in Greece. Once
captured, he was sent to Damsdorf camp, close to Auschwitz.
He escaped and was caught again,
now sentenced to death without trial.
He was saved at the last moment by
an Australian chaplain who jumped in between the German firing squad and my
father, warning them not to shoot due to the absence of trial.
Thankfully, he escaped again. This
time with a most unusual partner, Charles Coward – a brave British soldier,
nicknamed "The Count of Auschwitz".
We later learned from a
bestselling book that he and my father found a way to save Jewish victims from
the Auschwitz gas chambers.
My father and Charlie escaped
together and hid in a German farm. Towards the end of the war, my father took
a German carriage harnessed to two horses and headed towards the advancing
allied forces.
He was arrested by American
troops. It took a while for his identity to be established.
For five years we did not hear
from him. When he returned, our family gained a father with a new experience.
Later on, "The Count of Auschwitz"
visited Israel. It was a moving day for many Israelis but even more so for my
family. For us, he was not only the savior of many Jews but also our father's
brother-in-arms.
My Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen,
My family arrived in Israel when
it was still under British mandate. In our pockets were British Palestinian
passports. In our hearts the Balfour declaration.
The State of Israel
began to take shape as Great Britain, under the leadership of Winston
Churchill, saved the world from the Nazi threat.
It was a time when many countries
closed their gates to Holocaust survivors.
The nascent Jewish state was
alarmed.
The urgency of building a Jewish
state with open gates to absorb the displaced was crucial.
Under the leadership of David Ben
Gurion, it became our top priority. An entire nation’s calling.
The words of the great poet Isaac
Rosenbeg, killed by the last shrapnel on the last day of the First World War,
convey the spirit of the time:
They see with living eyes
How long they have been dead.
When discussing Israeli-British
relations, we must always look to history. It affected our past, it may guide
our future.
The British people were early to
adopt the Bible, to explore it, teach it to their children.
Biblical values were integrated
into their lives and prayers. They served as a moral compass.
The Ten Commandments
resonate in the Magna Carta: "To no one shall we sell, to none deny or
delay, right of justice"
Israel would not have a vibrant
democracy if it hadn't been for the British legacy.
The way in which Great Britain ran
the Mandate, and its courageous fight against the Nazis, inspired the state of
Israel.
David Ben Gurion, my mentor, was
in London during the Blitz. He was in awe of the unforgettable sight of
fathers and mothers, the elderly and infants remaining fearless under the rain
of the V-2 rockets.
He wrote home: "One can say that
if England, with all its humanity, were to survive the Nazi disaster, it would
be due to the rule of democracy and freedom that has taken root."
The United Kingdom proved that no
Missile can destroy freedom
Our relationship was mostly
illuminated, though shadows were cast from time to time, like the white paper
of 38.
The great light of the Balfour
declaration will never be dimmed.
We shall remember the many British
leaders who stood by Israel even in hard times.
As Churchill told the Parliament
during a debate about the Jewish National Home in Israel:
“You have no right to support
public declarations made in the name of your country in the crisis and heat of
war and then afterwards, when all is cold and prosaic, to turn around.”
This was the voice of Great
Britain - a bastion of reason throughout human history.
The United Kingdom shaped the
modern Middle East. I am not certain the story about 'divide and conquer'
is right. Rule in spite of division might be a more accurate
description.
The heavens united the Middle East
as the origin of the three monotheistic religions.
Earth, however, divided it. Ethnic
differences, old prejudices and tribal divisions have deep roots.
While prayers united, swords
wounded.
We never stopped praying. There
was never a war without regret. Missed opportunities were lost with no return.
My Lords, Ladies and gentlemen,
Agriculture divided the land,
introducing borders and fences, later to be defended by armed forces.
Times have changed. Science has
replaced land as the basis of economy.
Science knows no borders. It is
not impressed by ethnic differences or old prejudices.
In the new reality, classic armies
are no longer as relevant. Instead, we see the emergence of terror, nuclear
weapons and ballistic missiles. They stop at no border, and are not deterred
by fences.
These challenges have no better
answer but living in peace. Good wars are only those that are avoided.
The current economic crisis
reflects the world's inter-dependency. Globality does not separate policy from
economics. As a matter of fact, economy is the real locomotive of present
policy.
It is likely that the present
crisis will further globality and generate more responsibility.
Global threats unite us. So do
global hopes. We have to take a stand against the menace of terror and nuclear
threats.
Against the destruction of the
environment.
Against the misuse of water.
Against the waste of energy.
We have to tackle the spreading
maladies, which are the source of human bitterness.
We have to work together for human
life, dignity, freedom and introduce social justice in our midst.
These threats and hopes, are
particularly relevant in the Middle East. It seems the region dangerously
combines exaggerated declarations with a lack of action.
A crisis can occasionally help
redeem us from the shortcomings of our past.
The Wars of yesterday will not
resolve the conflicts of today.
My Lords, Ladies and Gentelmen,
In its 60 years of existence,
Israel fought 7 wars. Defeat would have ended our existence. However, victory
did not necessarily yield peace.
We insisted that a day of war
shall never postpone a day of freedom. That the Glory of victory shall never
weaken our desire for peace.
As a matter of fact, the peace we
have won, though incomplete, was achieved through negotiations.
We reached peace agreements with
Egypt and Jordan. Though at times imperfect, peace prevails as all sides
prefer it to the alternative.
We started to negotiate with the
Palestinians. We have made some progress. Eventually, we will accomplish our
goal.
We left Lebanon. We left Gaza and
dismantled the settlements we built there.
We are weighing the Syrian option
– whether it is a clear cut turn for peace.
We now explore the Saudi
initiative that evolved into an Arab Peace proposal.
Contrary to their past policy of
the three nays of Khartoum (no to recognition, no to negotiations and
no to peace) the Arab initiative calls for a comprehensive regional peace.
The Saudi king has initiated a
United Nations General Assembly session dedicated to the culture of peace.
In my address there last week, I
responded positively to the Arab initiative.
However, it should be clear that
agreement can not be achieved by a simple 'take-it-or-leave it' offer.
We couldn't accept all the
articles of the Arab Initiative. The truth is that it's hard to answer all
demands at a time when some parties in the region reject peace.
Hamas violently rejects
compromise. It continues to fire rockets at Israeli civilians. We can
understand land for Peace but will not accept land in return for rocket fire.
Hezbollah is stubbornly
belligerent. And the Iranian leadership is obsessed with its quest for
regional religious domination.
This quest is supported by long
range missiles, enriched uranium and fanatic incitement – all fueled by the
excessive price of oil.
The Iranian leadership's grand
design is to convert the Middle East from a region of nations into one
religious bloc.
They attempt to impose their
version on everyone. Whoever disagrees is deemed a heretic and is doomed to
disappear.
The conflict in the Middle East
serves as fertile ground for Ahmedinejad.
In discussions with Arab leaders I
hear their opposition to any form of religious colonialism.
My Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen,
There is a need for a joint effort
to stop the Iranian threat. To answer fear with hope.
The moderate Arab leaders feel
that ending the conflict must come before the conflict may bring an end to the
Middle East.
The international community should
prevent Iran from shattering the already fragile stability in the region.
The Middle East requires
international support to make change possible.
Israel will do its utmost to
support the moderates.
Some of the Arab leaders with whom
I spoke indicated that if the Palestinian conflict is resolved, they can view
it as a stepping stone towards a comprehensive peace
in the Middle East.
Israel decided to continue
negotiations with the Palestinians even throughout the upcoming elections.
We shall try to conclude the
domains in which major progress has already been made.
The basic premise of the
negotiations is the two state solution, namely, to establish an independent
Palestinian State living side by side with Israel, with secure borders, peace
and prosperity.
My Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen,
We are not at war with the Iranian
people. It is the Iranian leadership that calls for war against us –
non-Muslims and Muslims who refuse to adhere to their attempt to gain
hegemony.
On one hand, we see how Iranian
radicalism thrives on the division of the international community and the
disproportionate cost of oil.
It permits them to invest fortunes
in weapons of mass destruction in spite of their feeble economy.
This Iranian policy is a grave
danger to world security.
The way to confront it now is an
economic strategy that will value development and punish belligerency.
On the other hand, Europe, Japan,
Turkey and the United States have announced their economic commitment to the
Palestinian state- in-being.
They may be willing to extend
their support for a new Middle East in support of people, not weapons.
A new Middle East can follow the
example of the European Union: political borders without economic divide.
It is essential to end incitement
and introduce a language of peace – in places of worship and in schools alike.
Great Britain can play a leading
role in promoting this creation. It possesses an experience and intimate
knowledge of the dividing and unifying factors in the region.
It can link the region with the
global modern economy.
The world today is balanced
between despair and hope.
We have to encourage those working
for positive change in the region: from Egypt to the Palestinian Authority,
from Turkey to Saudi Arabia, from Jordan to Qatar.
Meetings between inter-faith
leaders can promote understanding among believers. We live in a world of
differences but not in a world of discrimination.
We do not have to kill one another
simply because we are different.
My Lords, Ladies and Gentlemen,
We are at a crossroad. Let's
choose hope over fear. Change over despair. Success in the Middle East can
provide the world with the energy it needs in times of crisis.
I am grateful for the privilege to
address you in this distinguished chamber. You represent two great
institutions, the front line in a fortress of democracy.
Your call to the world carries
enormous political and moral weight. The region needs your spirit, your voice
and firm support as it marches ahead towards a new dawn of peace.
Thank you.